New York Wrongful Death Lawyer
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Airplane Crash
    • Auto Accidents
    • Boating Accidents
    • Celebrity Deaths
    • Crime Victims
    • Design Flaw
    • Distraction
    • Driving While Intoxicated
    • Driving/Operating While Distracted
    • Frivolous Lawsuits
    • Government Liability
    • Hospital Negligence
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Punitive Damages
    • Sports Deaths
    • Student Suicides
    • Unusual Deaths
    • Violation of Safety Measure(s)
    • Workplace Accidents
    • Wrongful Death
  • Attorney Profile
  • Contact Us

Railroad Bridge Grate Gives Way: 20 Year-Old Falls to Death

Nov 21, 2011

Last August, late at night, in Clarksville, Indiana, three young friends decided to walk on a railroad bridge, high over the "Falls of the Ohio" park.

Two youths walked in the center of the bridge, on the wooden railroad ties. Their friend, Jesse Middleton, walked on metal grates, near the edge of the tracks.

Suddenly a metal grate gave way, and Middleton plunged 100 feet to the riverbed below, landing face down in water. He was dead by the time help reached him, .

There were signs posted on the bridge warning "No Trespassing".

The NY Court of Appeals, in a 1976 case, Basso v. Miller, set the still current standard for premises liability cases, by scrapping the "old" three-classification system, for trespassers, guests and business invitees, affording each group a different duty owed.

The Court "abandoned the classifications entirely and announced our adherence to the single standard of reasonable care under the circumstances whereby foreseeability shall be a measure of liability".

If New York law applied to this case, forseeability would be the "measure of liability". Did the railroad company know that trespassers regularly walked on the bridge? Did it think that warning signs would dissuade people from walking over it? Should fencing have been installed? Should the bridge have been inspected for pedestrian safety?

From the article about this incident, it appears that the bridge was used regularly by young people as a place to hang out, and had been for years.

It also reported that Middleton had taken two unprescribed "Lortabs" earlier that day. Maybe the three friends had been drinking on that summer night?

The Basso court continued: "Contributory and, now, comparative negligence, as well as assumption of the risk, all fit into their respective places, to be invoked when appropriate".

Did the three friends assume the risk of walking on a high bridge?

Without more information, one cannot determine if a viable cause of action for wrongful death exists in this case.

By Leland Williams On Nov 21, 2011 In Premises Liability, Wrongful Death


No comments

Search

Categories

  • Airplane Crash (9)
  • Auto Accidents (26)
  • Boating Accidents (5)
  • Celebrity Deaths (3)
  • Crime Victims (11)
  • Design Flaw (6)
  • Distraction (1)
  • Driving While Intoxicated (2)
  • Driving/Operating While Distracted (2)
  • Frivolous Lawsuits (7)
  • Government Liability (20)
  • Hospital Negligence (5)
  • Medical Malpractice (2)
  • Premises Liability (11)
  • Product Liability (7)
  • Punitive Damages (5)
  • Sports Deaths (10)
  • Student Suicides (6)
  • Unusual Deaths (4)
  • Violation of Safety Measure(s) (17)
  • Workplace Accidents (9)
  • Wrongful Death (120)

Recent Posts

  • Flight 3407: Release of "Internal E-mails" to Public Results in Motion for Protective Order
  • Virginia Tech Settles Student Suicide Wrongful Death Case
  • Nevada Helicopter Tour Deadly for Five
  • Death By Airline Food: Family Sues for More Than $1 Million
  • World War II Vet Freezes to Death: $.5 Million Settlement

95 Allens Creek Rd.
Building 1, Suite 107
Rochester, NY 14618
585.292.1110


Disclaimer / Attorney Advertising

Copyright © 2022 New York Wrongful Death Lawyer. All Right Reserved.

.